Electroencephalography (EEG) is a tool utilized in in-patient and outpatient hospital settings for the screening, diagnosis, and maintenance of neurological disorders including epilepsy. While a continuous EEG (cEEG) is the gold standard for assessing seizure activity, it has high operational costs, requires dependence on trained technicians and physicians to implement and interpret, and places a strain on medical systems in urban locales. A rapid response EEG (rrEEG) is a headband used in the emergency room for quick detection of seizure activity and is cheaper, but less accurate. When should one be used over the other in times of finite resources? Thus, resource allocation is crucial. Here, we use the 2HELPS2B scoring system of seizure risk stratification to determine if this scoring system can be applied to rapid-response EEG. Preliminary findings present a robust relationship between Ceribell scoring and seizure risk, temporally. These preliminary findings provide incentive for further study in being able to validate 2HELPS2B for rapid-response use as well as a system for the better allocation of finite resources. Further work may be fruitful in exploring which rapid-response features may impact subsequent continuous EEG data which can help care providers determine which patients may be okay with rapid-response EEG and those which may need continuous EEG screening immediately.